<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Contaminated Pistachios Re-Enter Market After Recall</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodbubbles.com/blog/2009/06/26/contaminated-pistachios-re-enter-market-after-recall/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodbubbles.com/blog/2009/06/26/contaminated-pistachios-re-enter-market-after-recall/</link>
	<description>Why Food Politics Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 19:48:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: foodbubbles</title>
		<link>http://www.foodbubbles.com/blog/2009/06/26/contaminated-pistachios-re-enter-market-after-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-2803</link>
		<dc:creator>foodbubbles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodbubbles.com/blog/?p=1533#comment-2803</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up, Carey.  I found this bit from their FAQ to be a little strange: 

&quot;Who decides when a recall is necessary?
Recalls are initiated by the manufacturer or distributor of the meat or poultry, sometimes at the request of FSIS. All recalls are voluntary. However, if a company refuses to recall its products, then FSIS has the legal authority to detain and seize those products in commerce.&quot;

My question is why is everything voluntary?  Is it so that the companies appear to be better serving the public?  How about not letting the food get contaminated in the first place.  That would be a reputable public service.  

Also, sorry Thunadir, no word on the undisclosed location of food recall cemeteries.  I asked &quot;Karen&quot;, the automated represenative for the Food Safety and Inspection Service, what happens to the recalled food and got nothing.  She gives a list of questions she thinks is close to the question you asked.  #14 on my list of related questions: &quot;What happens if eggs sweat?&quot;  Right... 

Go ahead, ask her anything: http://askkaren.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/askkaren.cfg/php/enduser/std_alp.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up, Carey.  I found this bit from their FAQ to be a little strange: </p>
<p>&#8220;Who decides when a recall is necessary?<br />
Recalls are initiated by the manufacturer or distributor of the meat or poultry, sometimes at the request of FSIS. All recalls are voluntary. However, if a company refuses to recall its products, then FSIS has the legal authority to detain and seize those products in commerce.&#8221;</p>
<p>My question is why is everything voluntary?  Is it so that the companies appear to be better serving the public?  How about not letting the food get contaminated in the first place.  That would be a reputable public service.  </p>
<p>Also, sorry Thunadir, no word on the undisclosed location of food recall cemeteries.  I asked &#8220;Karen&#8221;, the automated represenative for the Food Safety and Inspection Service, what happens to the recalled food and got nothing.  She gives a list of questions she thinks is close to the question you asked.  #14 on my list of related questions: &#8220;What happens if eggs sweat?&#8221;  Right&#8230; </p>
<p>Go ahead, ask her anything: <a href="http://askkaren.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/askkaren.cfg/php/enduser/std_alp.php" rel="nofollow">http://askkaren.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/askkaren.cfg/php/enduser/std_alp.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carey</title>
		<link>http://www.foodbubbles.com/blog/2009/06/26/contaminated-pistachios-re-enter-market-after-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-2736</link>
		<dc:creator>carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 07:08:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodbubbles.com/blog/?p=1533#comment-2736</guid>
		<description>check out the link for info on protocol:

http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Fact_Sheets/FSIS_Food_Recalls/index.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>check out the link for info on protocol:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Fact_Sheets/FSIS_Food_Recalls/index.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Fact_Sheets/FSIS_Food_Recalls/index.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thunadir, New King of Valhalla</title>
		<link>http://www.foodbubbles.com/blog/2009/06/26/contaminated-pistachios-re-enter-market-after-recall/comment-page-1/#comment-2724</link>
		<dc:creator>Thunadir, New King of Valhalla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 22:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodbubbles.com/blog/?p=1533#comment-2724</guid>
		<description>This kind of nutty behavior unacceptable. Complaints aside, though, is it really feasible to have an infrastructure in place that ensures tainted foods do go to an &quot;undisclosed location&quot; for destruction?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This kind of nutty behavior unacceptable. Complaints aside, though, is it really feasible to have an infrastructure in place that ensures tainted foods do go to an &#8220;undisclosed location&#8221; for destruction?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

